Compare Karbonn A55 vs. IBall Andi 3.5KKe Winner

Karbonn A55

IBall Andi 3.5KKe Winner

Price
Rs. 3,490.00	Rs. 2,184.00
Capacity
1100 mAH, Li-ion	1250 mAH, Li-ion
Camera Features
	Geo tagging, Touch to focus
Main Camera
3 MP	3.2 MP
Front Camera
0.3 MP	0.3 MP
Flash
LED	LED
Zoom
Digital Zoom	Digital Zoom
Operating Frequency
GSM 1800 / 900 MHz \| GSM 1800 / 900 MHz	GSM 1800 / 900 MHz \| GSM 1800 / 900 MHz
GPRS
Yes	Yes
EDGE
Yes	Yes
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n	Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g/n
Bluetooth
A2DP	Yes
USB Connectivity
USB Port	USB Port, microUSB 2.0
Touch Screen
Capacitive Touchscreen, Multi-touch	Capacitive Touchscreen
Weight
	101 grams
Dimensions
	122 x 65 x 10.5 mm
Colours
Black,White	Black,White
Screen Size
3.5 Inch	3.5 Inch
Screen Resolution
320 x 480 pixels	320 x 480 pixels
Pixel Density (sharpness)
165 ppi	165 ppi
Display Type
IPS LCD	TFT
Box Contents
Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card	Handset, Battery, Charger, Earphone, USB Cable, User Manual, Warranty Card
Sensors
Accelerometer	Accelerometer
GPS
with A-GPS	with A-GPS, GPS
OS Type
Android	Android
Brand
Karbonn	IBall
Model
A55	Andi 3.5KKe Winner
Operating System
Android v4.2 (Jelly Bean)	Android v4.2.2 (Jelly Bean)
SIM Slot(s)
Dual SIM, GSM+GSM	Dual SIM, GSM+GSM
FM Radio
Yes	Recording option
Loudspeaker
Yes	Yes
Audio Jack
3.5 mm	3.5 mm
Processor
Dual core, 1.2 GHz	Dual core, 1.3 GHz, Cortex A7
RAM
512 MB	256 MB
Internal Memory
4 GB	2 GB
Expandable Memory
Up to 32 GB	Up to 32 GB

Top 1 Reasons for Karbonn A55 Compared to IBall Andi 3.5KKe Winner

100.0% More RAM memory than IBall Andi 3.5KKe Winner. more RAM makes your mobile significantly faster and efficient. (512 MB vs. 256 MB)

Top 2 Reasons for IBall Andi 3.5KKe Winner Compared to Karbonn A55

13.6% more mAH battery than IBall Andi 3.5KKe Winner. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1250 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1100 mAH, Li-ion)

6.7% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than IBall Andi 3.5KKe Winner. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (3.2 MP vs. 3 MP)

Popular Mobile Comparison