Compare Qtek 2020i vs. Samsung S5620 Monte

Qtek 2020i

Samsung S5620 Monte

Price
Not Available	Rs. 7,190.00
Capacity
1300 mAH, Li-ion	960 mAH, Li-ion
TalkTime
Up to 4 Hours(2G)	Up to 9.7 Hours(2G) / Up to 4.96 Hours(3G)
Stand By Time
Up to 4 Hours(2G)
Main Camera
1.3 MP	3.2 MP
Video Recording
Recording Formats: MPEG-4, 3GP, AVI	320x240 @ 12
Zoom
Digital Zoom	Digital Zoom
Front Camera
	0.1 MP
Camera Features
	Effects, Multi Shot
3G
	Yes
GPRS
Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps	Class 10, 32 - 48 kbps kbps
EDGE
Yes	Class 10, 236.8 kbps
Wi-Fi
Wi-Fi 802.11, b	Wi-Fi 802.11, b/g
Bluetooth
Yes	v2.1, A2DP
USB Connectivity
No	No
More Connectivity
VoIP, Infrared
Touch Screen
Resistive Touchscreen	Capacitive Touchscreen
Weight
190 grams	92 grams
Dimensions
130 x 70 x 18 mm	108.8 x 53.7 x 12.40 mm
Screen Size
	3 Inch
Pixel Density (sharpness)
	155 ppi
Screen Resolution
320 x 320 pixels	240 x 400 pixels
Display Type
LCD	LCD
Box Contents
Handset, Charger, Battery, Earphone, Warranty Card, User Guide, USB Cable.
Brand
Qtek	Samsung
Model
2020i	S5620 Monte
Operating System
Windows Mobile
SIM Slot(s)
Single SIM, GSM	Single SIM, GSM
OS Type
Windows
FM Radio
Yes	Stereo FM, RDS
RAM
128 MB
Internal Memory
128 MB	227 MB
Expandable Memory
Yes	Up to 16 GB

Top 1 Reasons for Qtek 2020i Compared to Samsung S5620 Monte

35.4% more mAH battery than Samsung S5620 Monte. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1300 mAH, Li-ion vs. 960 mAH, Li-ion)

Top 3 Reasons for Samsung S5620 Monte Compared to Qtek 2020i

146.2% more mega pixels (MP) on main camera than Samsung S5620 Monte. More main camera resolution means better picture quality and detailed photos, which will look sharp on a large screen. (3.2 MP vs. 1.3 MP)

98.0 grams Lighter than Samsung S5620 Monte. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (92 grams vs. 190 grams)

5.6 mm Thinner than Samsung S5620 Monte. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (108.8 x 53.7 x 12.40 mm vs. 130 x 70 x 18 mm)

Popular Mobile Comparison