0.6 mm Thinner than Micromax X260. Slim mobile phone is easy to handle and looks gorgeous in hand. (111 x 47.5 x 14.60 mm vs. 110 x 47 x 15.20 mm)
10.2% Higher pixel density than Micromax X260. High pixel density shows sharper text and extremely detailed photos and videos. (141 ppi vs. 128 ppi)
8.3% more mAH battery than Micromax X260. More battery capacity reduces the need to charge your battery again. (1300 mAH, Li-ion vs. 1200 mAH, Li-ion)
3.0 grams Lighter than Micromax X260. light weight phone is easy to hold and can kept in your pocket for long time. (75 grams vs. 78 grams)
10.0% bigger screen size than Micromax X260. The bigger the screen size is better the user experience of reading and watching movie or video songs. (2.2 Inch vs. 2 Inch)
** Maximum 2 product of same category can be compared.